In my previous blog post, I encouraged the expansion of small-scale irrigation schemes as I felt this
was a sustainable alternative for Africa’s irrigation future rather than large-scale schemes. Whilst
searching for the different types of schemes available, I came across this
video, produced by the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, promoting the use of motor pumps, which led me to explore this technology
further.
The video claims that investments in motor pumps in
Sub-Saharan Africa could benefit 187 million people. So what are motor pumps
and are they a promising solution to the water crisis relating to
agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa?
A still from the above video shows how motorised pumps would enable the transport of water instead of farmers having to carry buckets of water from the access point to the pump multiple times. |
The FAO
claims that by 2025 there will be 1.2 thousand million people living in
Sub-Saharan Africa who will require over 300 million tons of grain and that
traditional irrigation methods will not be enough to meet the demand. But is
there actually as much potential for motor pumps to be used in Sub-Saharan Africa
as the video claims?
Let’s first take a look at the groundwater distribution in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Figure 1: Groundwater distribution in Africa (Source) |
Sub-Saharan Africa actually has areas with high abundance of groundwater. For example, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) has over 50,000 mm of groundwater storage. This is not to say that the whole of Sub-Saharan Africa is rich in groundwater sources, but there is certainly potential for groundwater to be used for irrigation. Figure 1 also shows that the DRC has relatively high recharge rates. But according to the NGO The Water Project, the government of the Congo does not have the funds to develop and maintain water pumping systems to obtain groundwater. Only about 69% of the population in Congo’s urban areas are able to access water from the state water utility but what about the rural areas, where most farmers operate? Again, according to The Water Project, many people in the rural areas get their water from streams and ponds. So here we see that groundwater abstraction has not taken place due to a lack of funds and investment for piped water supplies, especially in rural areas, making motor pumps an impossible method of small-scale irrigation if there are no piped access points in the first place. So a lack of access points due to insufficient funds is a major reason why small-scale irrigation schemes have not reached their potential.
Let’s now look at a country where there are relatively more
piped water access points. According to the World
Health Organisation, Burkina Faso is one country in the Sub-Saharan region
that has had one of the highest rates of growth of access to improved water supplies
between 1990 and 2008, with 76% of the population having access to an improved water supply. In this country, agriculture and stock farming contribute to 33% of the
country’s GDP (Pavelic
et al. 2012). Groundwater abstraction in the country has mainly been done
through boreholes and wells, and the number of boreholes in Burkina Faso
increased by 50% in just 8 years. Although data on groundwater specifically is
limited, Pavelic et al. (2012) claim that in 2009, only 6.4% of total
renewable water was used for irrigation and livestock watering. AG Water solutions
say that potential irrigable land still remains high at 233,500 ha. Stakeholders
were asked why small-scale irrigation like the use of motor pumps still remains
very low (AG Water
solutions) and the findings are as follows:
·
The local market for small-scale irrigation
technologies has been very small with limited choice, making it difficult for
farmers to choose a technology that suits their farming practices the best.
Small markets also mean that spare parts become difficult to obtain making
maintenance of the pumps nearly impossible.
·
Farmers do not know how to actually use the
devices due to a lack of technical training. Like the video suggests,
information is needed to use the technology well.
·
The only way that motor pumps have actually been
implemented is through large-scale project investments (rather than individual)
and where the product is being marketed.
The video also suggests that there is:
·
A lack of access to flexible credit, preventing
farmers from purchasing them in the first place –USD$250 for a motor pump is
relatively high for a small-scale farmer (The
Guardian 2013).
·
A lack of pump rental markets. A pump rental
market is where entrepreneurs can rent out pumps, and/or provide their own irrigation
service which could be an alternative for poorer farmers unable to purchase a
pump for themselves.
I personally like the idea of pump rental markets. Not only would this reduce the need to teach each and every farmer wanting to use a motorised pump how to actually use it, but it would also eliminate the need for the individual purchasing of pumps which could be tedious to maintain on an individual basis
post-purchase. Implementation of microfinance schemes and their access can be a
long and slow process, especially given the unwillingness of lenders to provide
agricultural loans (The
Guardian 2013). Furthermore, I see pump rental markets as having a large
multiplier effect – not only in terms of efficiency as entrepreneurs learn how best to use the pump with experience, but in terms of employment, as markets like these can create a diverse range of employment such as in maintenance, giving people additional opportunities. So although the relationship between groundwater and small-scale irrigation such as motor pumps may seem
simple, there are many external factors that need to be considered, and
investment externally by NGOs and government bodies should go towards expanding
pump rental markets.
Hey Shriya
ReplyDeleteIf a rental market becomes the norm, then as markets grow and farmers of varying success rely on them, would there not be the risk of poorer farmers being priced out through unaffordable rents?
Are there any possible schemes to mitigate that risk?
Hey Baljeet,
DeleteThanks for the comment. In order to stay in business, the pump rental price would not be allowed to go up massively, even with high demand, as the cost of renting should be cheaper than buying. Furthermore, the market for pump rentals would be small-scale farmers, not large-scale, as large-scalefarmers can probably afford to implement their own irrigation schemes on their land, so the price can't rise by a large amount either or else they would lose market share. As demand increases, there is potential for competition which should also help keep prices low. However, I do agree with your concern that the smallest of farmers may be priced out, however, if they are operating on a the smallest of scales then irrigation may not actually increase productivity on their farms by much, meaning they may not choose to rent pumps.
I haven't come across any possible schemes, but rental markets for all sorts of items are quite common in Africa as many people cannot afford to buy things. Due to this, there are a range of legal instruments including contracts, accounting practices and laws that are specifically adapted and designed for rental markets, so this is something that can be used to ensure that businesses are operating fairly. Also, many outside organisations and NGOs are training people to become entrepreneurs for pump rental markets, and an NGO investing in this would probably wish to see an increase irrigation across the area, and with this in mind, I'm sure that they would ensure that pricing was equitable.
Obviously not everyone can benefit and unfortunately some farmers may lose out inevitably, however, with cost being a major obstacle for the implementation of irrigation schemes in the first place, I believe that this is the cheapest option for small-scale farmers and one that offers a majority of small-scale farmers to increase productivity on their farms.